Bush calls for sanctions, not attack, on North Korea

Bush calls for sanctions, not attack, on North Korea

October 12, 2006
Associated Press

President Bush demanded stiff sanctions on North Korea Wednesday for its reported nuclear test and asserted the U.S. has “no intention of attacking” the reclusive regime despite its claims that it needs atomic weapons to guard against such a strike.

Still, in a Rose Garden news conference, Bush said the United States remains committed to diplomacy but also “reserves all options to defend our friends in the region” . . . [Click for more]

See also:


Technorati : , , , , ,

Advertisements

Posted on October 13, 2006, in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. No carrot, no stick. No wonder it won’t work.

  2. According to many sources North Korea has full nuclear capability, but it’ll take Iran many years to gain that capability, even using the nuclear technology that was sold to them by the likes of Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz back in the 1970’s. See link for evidence: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=HAA20060306&articleId=2067

    Unfortunately, South Koreans are Communists, not Islamofascists (I use the term Islamofascist loosely here) so they will get a pass. We have known that both the U.S. and Britain have been planning to invade Iran for at least 2 years now. See link for evidence: http://edwardcopeland.blogspot.com/2006/04/us-britain-staged-iran-invasion-plan.html

    The occupation of Iran is a strategic part of a globalist plan to occupy and control the Middle East. First to be invaded was Afganistan, second was Iraq, third will be Iran.

    I ask you LDS Patriot, why did we invade Afganistan? We were told it was because the Taliban were hiding Osama Bin Laden, but Bin Laden has never been formally charged with 9/11 (strange but true). Why did we invade Iraq? We were told it was because of WMD’s, but none were ever found. We were also told that Iraq was connected to 9/11, but our President now claims that that is not true.

    The majority of the alleged ‘Islamofascist’ terrorists who commited the hijackings on 9/11 were Saudis, so why haven’t we even reprimanded Saudi Arabia for 9/11? I’ll let you connect the dots here.

    Our current adminstration now finds itself having to downplay the nuclear capabiltiy of South Korea while simultaneously exaggerating Iran’s nuclear capability. All this to support a policy of agression and occupation in the Middle East. This policy of occupation is why our president refuses to even entertain thoughts of leaving Iraq, no matter how bloody it gets. It is also why we now have permanent bases in Afganistan.

    So, I ask you, what percentage of what I have just claimed is true? Do you know outright, or do you even care? I know what I have to say is diametrically opposed to your viewpoints, so does that make it partisan or untrue? Can something be judged to be true or untrue without regard to partisan politics? Just a little food for thought.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: