Protec answers Steven Jones’ “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?”
One of the most important papers debunking Steven Jones et al and 9/11 truth movement.
With all due respect to distinguished scholars and others alike, it matters little whether Alex Jones is drawing parallels to building implosions, Steven Jones is drawing conclusions from hot metal or Chuck Jones is drawing dynamite in the hands of Wile E. Coyote; for assertions to be credible they must eventually comply with the scientific principles for explosive initiation and of structural failure, realistic judgments of probability, and indisputable visual evidence.
Thus far, every assertion we have investigated scores a resounding 0 for 3.
Our team welcomes the opportunity to review additional data as it becomes available. However barring any additional evidence, those making allegations similar to the points above may do will to consider that sometimes “asking tough questions” isn’t the biggest challenge; It’s accepting the answer and decisively moving on to other areas that render their contributions productive and valuable. …[Read more]